Wednesday, November 23, 2005

Feds Get Down & 'Dirty'

He's the "dirty bomber"! He plotted with Al Qaeda to blow up American apartment buildings! He's raiser?!

After more than three years in a military prison, held as an enemy combatant without charge and without access to counsel, Jose Padilla was finally indicted on federal charges yesterday.

When this former gang-member-turned-terror-suspect was picked up in 2002, the sensationalist allegations were that he was planning a radiological attack on an American city. In 2004, the Justice Department suggested that the so-called "dirty bomber" also planned to use natural gas to blow up American apartment complexes.

Neither of these allegations surfaced in the indictment of Padilla that was announced by Attorney General Gonzales yesterday. Instead, he is being charged with "being part of a violent terrorism conspiracy rooted in North America but directed at sending money and recruits overseas." Don't get me wrong, that doesn't sound too good, but a dirty bomb it's not. The Bush administration may like to sex-up intelligence reports, but they don't seem to mind leaving the indictments homely.

So, why only this after three years? Is this really all we got? Here's an eyebrow-raising paragraph from the Washington Post:
The Bush administration hopes that the indictment will effectively derail the possibility of an adverse ruling from the Supreme Court in the Padilla case, which could decide to limit the government's ability to detain U.S. citizens as enemy combatants.
Now it makes sense! The Bush administration is coming up with these (comparatively) bland charges not because they think Padilla has the right to a trial, but because they want to ensure that they can deny the same from any other U.S. citizen they might happen to charge as an enemy combatant in the future. Pretty sneaky, sis!

As soon as the charges were filed, Gonzales argued that because Padilla "has now been charged in a grand jury in Florida, we believe that the petition [to the Supreme Court] is moot and that the petition should not be granted." This is yet another example of the government fighting tooth and nail against any limitations (or even scrutiny) whatsoever on their treatment of terror war detainees. But they're treating them just fine, mind you. We can take their word on that (and have to, thanks to the veil of secrecy).

And what of the value of holding Padilla in the brig nigh these three years as an enemy combatant?
The new charges rely on evidence gathered separately from Padilla's confinement and interrogation in military custody, meaning the government does not have to worry about the admissibility of such evidence in civilian courts, Justice officials said.
In short, nada. Whatever our government "learned" from him during his controversial incarceration is not part of this indictment—in part because it may not be admissible in court. And yet Bush wants to make sure that this option—one that has obviously proved so useful—is still open to him.

Meanwhile, Human Rights Watch is guardedly optimistic about this turn of events, proving once and for all that they're totally incapable of putting two and two together.
Listed on BlogShares